Military kit failing women in the forces
· news
Military Kit Still Failing Women, Troops Say
Five years have passed since the Atherton report exposed the inadequacies of military kit for women in the British armed forces. Despite promises to rectify this issue by 2022, servicewomen continue to face ill-fitting uniforms and equipment that jeopardize their safety on deployment.
The Ministry of Defence’s efforts to upgrade body armour have been sluggish, with some progress made but significant hurdles remaining. One example is the Virtus Scalable Tactical Vest introduced in 2022, which features adjustable straps and smaller flat plates designed for female troops. However, veterans like Rhian Brown, who left the Army Reserve after seven years, attest that even this newer model falls short.
“Women are not flat, we have breasts and curves,” she emphasizes. “The plates are flat, it doesn’t fit, it’s not flexible – fit isn’t about vanity, it’s about safety.” The lack of curved body armour plates for UK servicewomen stands in stark contrast to the MoD’s recent expenditure on 2,000 sets for Ukrainian forces.
Dr. Mary Keeling from the Centre for Evidence for the Armed Forces acknowledges that there have been “good steps in the right direction” but notes that consistent rollout and availability of new female kit and equipment remain elusive. The MoD’s own figures highlight the importance of this issue: a 2025 report by Ofsted revealed for the fourth consecutive year that women and smaller recruits were being issued ill-fitting kit, rendering them at a disadvantage.
Industry experts agree that curved plates provide better protection than flat ones. However, these plates are not yet available to UK servicewomen. The MoD’s justification for the delay is unclear, given its commitment to increasing the number of women in the forces and acknowledging the importance of proper kit.
Plymouth MP Fred Thomas has said it is “unacceptable for some people to be better protected than others.” This sentiment echoes those expressed by veterans like Stacey Denyer, who participated in a ministerial roundtable on implementing the Atherton report’s recommendations. As the MoD works towards its 30% female target by 2030, addressing this fundamental issue of kit and equipment is vital.
For now, servicewomen continue to face subpar kit that compromises their safety. It remains to be seen whether the new ballistic plates promised for delivery in 2028 will finally address this long-standing problem. Until then, it seems the UK’s military continues to struggle with an insidious issue that has far-reaching implications for not just its female personnel but also its overall effectiveness.
In a world where women make up an increasingly large proportion of armed forces worldwide, providing them with equipment tailored to their unique needs should no longer be seen as an afterthought. The MoD must prioritize the development and distribution of proper kit that respects the diversity of its soldiers’ bodies. Anything less would be a disservice not just to the women in uniform but also to the military’s own ideals of equality and service.
Reader Views
- RJReporter J. Avery · staff reporter
The Ministry of Defence's slow pace in providing adequate body armour for female troops is not just a matter of equality; it's a safety issue that's been exacerbated by the department's piecemeal approach to upgrade. While Rhian Brown's experience with ill-fitting plates is telling, what's also concerning is the reliance on industry experts who confirm curved plates offer better protection. Yet, we're still waiting for these plates to be rolled out consistently across all UK forces. It's time for the MoD to match its words with decisive action and commit to a comprehensive solution that prioritizes women's safety above all else.
- CSCorrespondent S. Tan · field correspondent
The Ministry of Defence's sluggish pace in upgrading body armour for women is not just a case of bureaucratic inefficiency, but also a security threat. The lack of curved plates not only compromises safety, but also perpetuates a culture where women's bodies are seen as an afterthought. It's not about vanity or conformity; it's about providing equal protection to all troops. One area that warrants further scrutiny is the MoD's procurement process: why did they spend £3 million on 2,000 sets of curved plates for Ukrainian forces if similar funds can't be allocated for UK servicewomen?
- EKEditor K. Wells · editor
It's astonishing that five years after the Atherton report exposed the military kit shortcomings for women, little has changed. The introduction of adjustable straps and smaller flat plates in 2022 was a half-measure at best. While some argue that women should adapt to existing kit, it's a short-sighted approach that prioritizes conformity over safety. What's also striking is how this issue pales in comparison to the UK's military aid to Ukraine – where 2,000 sets of female body armour were allocated last year – while our own servicewomen continue to suffer with ill-fitting kit.
Related articles
More from Dayd
- › US Strikes Iran for 11th Consecutive Night
- › Nintendo Refuses Tariff Refunds to Consumers
- › Trump Blames Jordan's Defense System for US Soldier Deaths
- › Monarch: Legacy of Monsters Prequel Series Casts Corey Stoll
- › Dividend Dilemma: Reinvest or Contribute to Super?
- › Israeli Strikes in Gaza Leave Dozen Dead